Public Release - 2026-07-21
Artifact: reward_entropy_profile_v1. This note treats a benchmark score as one procurement input, not a business outcome: transfer to the operating task, recovery after failure, retained constraints, human review cost, and failure cost remain separate review fields.
Artifact
Model rankings can narrow a candidate set, but an enterprise deploys a workflow on its own data, permissions, review capacity, and failure surface. The review object keeps the reported score separate from the evidence that the score transfers to that operating environment.
Transfer
Two models with similar benchmark scores can create different business value when one preserves constraints, exposes uncertainty, and recovers from failure with less human work. Task transfer, review cost, and failure cost therefore remain independent fields.
Review
A useful challenge should identify a missing field, an unsupported transfer claim, a hidden review burden, or a condition under which constraints fail to persist. The protocol does not certify a model, guarantee deployment value, or replace task-specific evaluation.
The reported score, benchmark version, task split, and evaluation conditions.
The observed transfer from the benchmark task to the actual operating task and data.
The route by which the workflow detects, contains, and recovers from a failed output.
The constraints that remain active when the context, tool chain, or task distribution changes.
The time and expertise required to inspect, correct, or approve the model's work.
The operational, financial, legal, or safety cost when an accepted output is wrong.