No AGI claim
The project does not claim general intelligence, consciousness, or human-like wisdom. It studies measurable learning, evidence, restraint, and repair.
Claim Boundaries
This page states what the public evidence field claims, what it does not claim, and what can be challenged. A claim without a boundary is not stronger; it is easier to misread. The public layer is built for inspection; the private layer protects execution systems, customers, credentials, and conference anonymity.
Public Release Classes
What We Claim
The public program studies how AI systems can move from plausible answers to auditable action. The recurring interface is: claim, falsifier, evidence threshold, warrant, receipt, regret path, and clean-learning boundary.
claim -> falsifier -> evidence threshold -> warrant -> receipt -> regret -> repair
This is a research and engineering claim about how high-risk AI action should be bounded, audited, and repaired. It is not a certificate that every current system instance is deployment-ready.
The project does not claim general intelligence, consciousness, or human-like wisdom. It studies measurable learning, evidence, restraint, and repair.
Public experiments are not presented as universal SOTA rankings. They are evidence panels for protocols, failure modes, and claim boundaries.
Finance-facing public materials do not claim live trading profitability or stable alpha unless a future clean denominator and post-cost evidence support it.
Robot, safety, and agent protocols are not deployment approvals. Real deployment requires independent review, real environment validation, and domain governance.
The public work is framed around safety, restraint, recovery, evidence integrity, and protective high-risk decision systems.
The protocols are designed to improve auditability and decision hygiene, not to replace qualified human responsibility in regulated domains.
Public / Private Boundary
Execution rules, live decision thresholds, order routing, account-specific traces, and market-operation internals stay private.
Client identities, tenant logs, private prompts, support records, and commercial pilot details are not public artifacts.
Internal agent routing, tool schedules, memory policies, and operational playbooks are not exposed as open-source material.
Business automation, deployment calendars, pricing logic, sales routing, and internal prioritization remain confidential.
Double-blind submissions and supplements are handled separately from public records until disclosure is allowed.
API keys, tokens, cookies, private endpoints, access policies, and local credential caches are never public evidence.
How To Attack
Contribute Without Needing Trust
A contributor does not need private access, personal trust, or agreement with the project. The clean route is to name the public claim, point to the public artifact, show the failure or improvement, and keep the repair bounded.
trust-free contribution = fixed public target + failure mode + reproduction path + bounded repair